Respiratory Therapist-Managed Arterial Catheter Insertion and Maintenance Program: Experience in a Non-Teaching Community Hospital.

BACKGROUND: Usual practice in community health-care settings indicates that arterial catheters are inserted by physicians. In the context of a respiratory therapist (RT)-managed arterial catheter placement protocol being implemented in our community hospital, the current study describes the implementation and outcomes of this RT-managed arterial catheter insertion and maintenance program. METHODS: Tuality Healthcare is a 215-bed community health-care system (10-bed ICU) in Hillsboro, Oregon. With the goal of enhancing the quality of ICU care, an RT-managed multidisciplinary team was implemented to lead the delivery of protocolized ventilator liberation, arterial catheter insertion, and arterial blood gas utilization. Preparation for the program included didactic teaching, simulation-based training, and precepted procedural experience. A database was created for audit and quality improvement purposes. Outcomes and arterial blood gas utilization data were obtained from the audit database and from the hospital electronic health record. RESULTS: During the 4-y period (March 1, 2012, to April 31, 2016), 256 arterial catheter insertion attempts were made by a team of 12 qualified RTs. The success rate for the initial placement attempt by RT was high (94.5% [242 of 256]). Sixty-three percent of arterial lines were placed in patients to help manage severe sepsis/septic shock. No ischemic or infectious complications were reported during the study period. Nearly 40% (96 of 242) of the successful placements by RTs on initial attempts were performed during the night shift, when intensivists were not physically present in the ICU. CONCLUSIONS: This experience establishes the feasibility of an RT-managed arterial catheter placement program in a community ICU. The RT-managed program was characterized by a high degree of success and safety and allowed arterial catheter placement at times when intensivists were not available in the ICU. This experience extends the sparse reported experience of RT-managed arterial catheter placement programs and underscores the value of RTs as members of the ICU team.

Effect of social deprivation on the admission rate and outcomes of adult respiratory emergency admissions.

BACKGROUND: Patients with respiratory disorders constitute a major source of activity for Acute Medicine. We have examined the impact of Socio-Economic Status (SES) and weather factors on the outcomes (30-day in-hospital mortality) of emergency hospitalisations with a respiratory presentation. METHODS: All emergency respiratory admissions to St. James Hospital, Dublin, from 2002 to 2014 were evaluated. Patients were categorized by quintile of Deprivation Index, and evaluated against hospital admission rate (/1000 population) and 30-day in-hospital mortality. Univariate and multivariable risk estimates (Odds Ratios (OR) or Incidence Rate Ratios (IRR)) were calculated, using logistic or zero truncated Poisson regression as appropriate. RESULTS: There were 32,538 episodes in 14,093 patients, representing 39.5% of medical emergency episodes over the 13-yr period. Deprivation Quintile independently predicted the admission rate, with incidence rate ratios (IRR) of Q3 2.02 (95% CI: 1.27, 3.23), Q4 2.55 (95% CI: 1.35, 4.83) and Q5 5.68 (95% CI: 3.56, 9.06). The 30-day in-hospital mortality for the highest quintile was increased (p < 0.01), Q5 1.31 (95% CI: 1.07, 1.61). Particulate matter (PM10) was predictive for the top two quintiles (>17.2 and 23.8 µg/m3 respectively) with an OR for a worse outcome of Q4 1.22 (95% CI: 1.07, 1.40) and Q5 1.24 (95% CI: 1.08, 1.42). Weather (season) and the daily temperature did not affect the admission rate but were significantly associated with worse outcome. CONCLUSION: Socio-Economic Status influences the admission rate incidence and hospital mortality of respiratory emergency admissions; local environmental conditions (air pollution and temperature) appear only relevant to the mortality outcomes.

Standards for quality care in respiratory rehabilitation in patients with chronic pulmonary disease. Quality Healthcare Committee. Spanish Society of Pneumology and Thoracic Surgery (SEPAR).

Respiratory rehabilitation (RR) has been shown to be effective with a high level of evidence in terms of improving symptoms, exertion capacity and health-related quality of life (HRQL) in patients with COPD and in some patients with diseases other than COPD. According to international guidelines, RR is basically indicated in all patients with chronic respiratory symptoms, and the type of program offered depends on the symptoms themselves. As requested by the Spanish Society of Pneumology and Thoracic Surgery (SEPAR), we have created this document with the aim to unify the criteria for quality care in RR. The document is organized into sections: indications for RR, evaluation of candidates, program components, characteristics of RR programs and the role of the administration in the implementation of RR. In each section, we have distinguished 5 large disease groups: COPD, chronic respiratory diseases other than COPD with limiting dyspnea, hypersecretory diseases, neuromuscular diseases with respiratory symptoms and patients who are candidates for thoracic surgery for lung resection.

Adherence to acceptability and repeatability criteria for spirometry in complex lung function laboratories.

BACKGROUND: Few published data exist for adherence rates to spirometry acceptability and repeatability criteria in clinical respiratory laboratories. This study quantified adherence levels in this setting and observed changes in adherence levels as a result of feedback and ongoing training. METHODS: Two tertiary hospital-based, lung function laboratories (L1 and L2) participated. Approximately 100 consecutive, FVC spirometry sessions were reviewed for each year from 2004 to 2008 at L1 and for years 2004 and 2008 at L2. Each spirometric effort and session was interrogated for adherence to the acceptability and repeatability criteria of international spirometry standards of the time. Feedback of audit results and refresher training were provided at L1 throughout the study; in addition, a quality rating scale was implemented in 2006. No formal feedback or follow-up training was provided at L2. RESULTS: We reviewed 707 test sessions over the 5 years. There was no difference in adherence rates to acceptability and repeatability criteria between sites in 2004 (L1 61%, L2 59%, P = .89). There was, however, a significant difference between sites in 2008 (L1 92%, L2 65%, P < .001). No difference was seen at L2 between 2004 and 2008 (P = .26), while L1 experienced a significant increase in adherence levels between 2004 and 2008 (61% to 92% P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Clinical respiratory laboratories met published spirometry acceptability and repeatability criteria only 60% of the time in the first audit period. This improved with regular review, feedback, and implementation of a rating scale. Auditing of spirometry quality, feedback, and implementation of test rating scales need to be incorporated as an integral component of laboratory quality assurance programs to improve adherence to international acceptability and repeatability criteria.

A survey of respiratory and sleep services in New Zealand undertaken by the Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand (TSANZ).

AIMS: In 2004, the NZ Branch of the TSANZ published "Standards for Adult Respiratory and Sleep Services" on the Ministry of Health's (MoH) website.1 The aim of this survey was to evaluate each of the 21 District Health Boards' (DHBs) performance against the published standards, concentrating particularly on staffing, infrastructure, clinical support services, implementation of guidelines, quality assurance activity, and basic services (sleep, lung function, and oxygen). METHODS: Postal questionnaire survey of all DHBs in late 2006. RESULTS: All 21 DHBs responded. Only 10 of 21 DHBs were complying with the minimum standards of care. Main deficiencies in care related to: inadequate medical staffing rates, lack of quality assurance measures and insufficient laboratory testing (sleep and lung function). The lack of monitoring of such basic activities as outpatient clinic attendances, oxygen and sleep services, and the non implementation of treatment guidelines were of particular concern. Seven-fold variations in prescription of assisted ventilation equipment and oxygen therapy exist across the country. CONCLUSIONS: When evaluated against minimum standards of care published in 2004, major gaps in service provision exist in New Zealand. Access to services is variable. There is a lack of national leadership and insufficient regional organisation leading to large gaps in service provision of even basic respiratory services. Immediate changes to the current service provision structures are required.

Practitioner competency assessment and career ladders as a recruiting and retention tool.

The assessment of competency for respiratory care practitioners involves a thorough understanding of what defines competence, the development of a well-planned, continuous process that starts with new employee orientation, and a clearly communicated set of staff expectations. Career ladders are a tool that can be used to aid staff retention and recruitment, thereby reducing multiple costs associated with a high employee turnover rate, and to encourage professional development and accountability while achieving important departmental objectives.

Respiratory care protocol development and impact.

Respiratory care (RC) protocols are widely regarded as the most appropriate method for properly allocating and delivering most forms of respiratory therapy. The use of protocols has increased steadily over the past 15 years, but, despite the successes and modest implementation of RC protocols across the country, there is room for improvement in adopting RC protocols for the effective use of respiratory care services. It also seems that many physicians have yet to be won over, and RC managers need to take the first step toward protocol development and implementation. This article addresses some of the issues surrounding the development of respiratory care protocols and the impact that their implementation may have based on experience gained to date.

Balanced scorecard for methodology for total performance improvement.

Health care organizations are complex adaptive systems, a set of connected or interdependent parts or agents that include caregivers, patients, and processes. Consequently, health care organizations are prone to problems and are not always predictable environments. Fundamental changes are needed in the organization and in the delivery of health care in the United States. This article presents a proven method of instituting and tracking the changes that can ensure a respiratory care department is delivering the appropriate level of care.

Audit of acute admissions of COPD: standards of care and management in the hospital setting.

Despite publication of several management guidelines for COPD, relatively little is known about standards of care in clinical practice. Data were collected on the management of 1400 cases of acute admission with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in 38 UK hospitals to compare clinical practice against the recommended British Thoracic Society standards. Variation in the process of care between the different centres was analysed and a comparison of the management by respiratory specialists and nonrespiratory specialists made. There were large variations between centres for many of the variables studied. A forced expiratory volume in one second measurement was found in only 53% of cases. Of the investigations recommended in the acute management arterial blood gases were performed in 79% (interhospital range 40-100%) of admissions and oxygen was formally prescribed in only 64% (range 9-94%). Of those cases with acidosis and hypercapnia 35% had no further blood gas analysis and only 13% received ventilatory support. Long-term management was also deficient with 246 cases known to be severely hypoxic on admission yet two-thirds had no confirmation that oxygen levels had returned to levels above the requirements for long-term oxygen therapy. Only 30% of current smokers had cessation advice documented. To conclude, the median standards of care observed fell below those recommended by the guidelines. The lowest levels of performance were for patients not under the respiratory specialists, but specialists also have room for improvement. The substantial variation in the process of care between hospitals is strong evidence that it is possible for other centres with poorer performance to improve their levels of care.

Outcomes management and asthma education in a community hospital: ongoing monitoring of health status.

An outcomes management system was implemented to evaluate the effectiveness of an asthma education program and to test its feasibility as a quality improvement tool. The study demonstrated the value of continuous monitoring of health status and the advantages of a multidimensional approach to outcome assessment and program evaluation.

The COPD critical pathway: a case study in progress.

Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) consume many health care resources and require complex coordination of care among multiple caregivers. In this report, we share our experiences at Fletcher Allen Health Care, Burlington, Vermont, in developing and implementing a critical pathway for these patients. The COPD pathway has resulted in measurable improvements in the quality of care and has provided us with lessons that will enhance our use of critical pathway methods.

Clinical practice guidelines for resuscitation in acute care hospitals.

The development of the AHA Guidelines for CPR and ECC and the AARC RACH Clinical Practice Guideline should both be instrumental in improving the performance of RCPs on in-hospital resuscitation teams. The AARC and AHA are assuming important leadership roles in this movement by publishing CPGs for CPR and ECC. RCPs with ACLS training are in a prime position to assume more responsibility on resuscitation teams within acute care facilities. They should be prominent members of the resuscitation team--committed to the entire team's performance--and be actively involved in ACLS training. The first step in that process is to study the current levels of RCP competence in ACLS. Further, RCPs and health-care providers should define the goals of resuscitation in terms of long-term survival, quality of life, and years of useful life after CPR. The cost of inadequate attention to which patients should have DNR orders is a drain on the entire health-care system. Research on the impact of disease categories on CPR outcome should be used to educate physicians, nurses, and RCPs so they can help patients better understand their chances of regaining their pre-CPR quality of life. Successful CPR outcome should be carefully defined using the patient's disease category. Each patient should be individually evaluated for DNR orders. As suggested by Schwenzer, "Patients' perception of their quality of life before and after CPR should guide their and our decisions." However, we must all accept the responsibility for defining the limitations of medical technology and try to determine when CPR is futile.

RCPs (respiratory care practitioners) and health-care reform: demonstrating value, creating opportunity.

We should embrace respiratory care protocols. We have had a system in our hospital for more than two years; it has been very successful. We have approximately 60-70% of all of our therapy now ordered by a true protocol process. Some people have been dragged kicking and screaming through this process, including a number of respiratory care practitioners. It is more work. It is harder. Yes, it takes more time and more work to be a professional, but a professional is what you want to be. Anybody can go around and stick those nebulizers in people's mouths, but not everyone has the skill to determine which patients do not need that nebulizer or which may need a different drug or a different therapy. We must demonstrate through projects our ability to have an impact on the delivery of unnecessary and inappropriate care, and we must have physician support for what we are doing. These elements are essential to our survival. When we embrace appropriate and effective technology, we demonstrate value. If we show--through improved weaning technology--that we can decrease length of stay by decreasing the time that people are on ventilators, we demonstrate value. If we function as effective bronchoscopy assistants who help to treat people and get them out of the hospital or avoid hospitalization entirely, we demonstrate value. So, we must embrace technology. We need to function across the entire continuum of care to demonstrate value. We need to start managing health instead of managing illness.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

National audit of acute severe asthma in adults admitted to hospital. Standards of Care Committee, British Thoracic Society.

OBJECTIVE: To ascertain the standard of care for hospital management of acute severe asthma in adults. DESIGN: Questionnaire based retrospective multicentre survey of case records. SETTING: 36 hospitals (12 teaching and 24 district general hospitals) across England, Wales, and Scotland. PATIENTS: All patients admitted with acute severe asthma between 1 August and 30 September 1990 immediately before publication of national guidelines for asthma management. MAIN MEASURES: Main recommendations of guidelines for hospital management of acute severe asthma as performed by respiratory and non-respiratory physicians. RESULTS: 766 patients (median age 41 (range 16-94) years) were studied; 465 (63%) were female and 448 (61%) had had previous admissions for asthma. Deficiencies were evident for each aspect of care studied, and respiratory physicians performed better than non-respiratory physicians. 429 (56%) patients had had their treatment increased in the two weeks preceding the admission but only 237 (31%) were prescribed oral steroids. Initially 661/766 (86%) patients had peak expiratory flow measured and recorded but only 534 (70%) ever had arterial blood gas tensions assessed. 65 (8%) patients received no steroid treatment in the first 24 hours after admission. Variability of peak expiratory flow was measured before discharge in 597/759 (78%) patients, of whom 334 (56%) achieved good control (variability < 25%). 47 (6%) patients were discharged without oral or inhaled steroids; 182/743 (24%) had no planned outpatient follow up and 114 failed to attend, leaving 447 (60%) seen in clinic within two months. Only 57/629 (8%) patients were recorded as having a written management plan. CONCLUSIONS: The hospital management of a significant minority of patients deviates from recommended national standards and some deviations are potentially serious. Overall, respiratory physicians provide significantly better care than non-respiratory physicians.

Development of a safety module to satisfy the requirements of regulatory agencies for hospital staff safety education.

UNLABELLED: We developed a self-administered safety module (SM) to instruct respiratory care (RC) employees in their responsibilities during emergency situations. The SM has five phases--a pretest (PRE), statement of module objectives, presentation of information in outline form, a posttest (POST), and review of the POST. This training meets the specific requirements outlined by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration and the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. METHODS: To evaluate the effectiveness of the SM, we compared test scores among three groups of employees: those with no previous exposure to safety education in the hospital setting (G1), those with exposure at other institutions (G2), and those with exposure at this institution (G3). Our goal was to equalize the POST scores among the three groups. Using a 1-way analysis of variance, we tested to find whether the PRE scores were different from one another and repeated the test for the POST scores. We tested for within-group differences, PRE vs POST, using paired t tests. RESULTS: Previous exposure to hospital safety management was associated with significantly higher PRE scores (p < 0.001). No previous exposure was associated with the greatest improvement (POST vs PRE), although all groups experienced significant improvement (p < 0.05). The POST scores for G1 were significantly lower than those of either G2 or G3 (p < 0.001). However, they were still adequate to pass (> or = 80%). CONCLUSION: This self-administered SM is an effective and efficient method of educating RC personnel, regardless of entry-level knowledge, in safety issues and, although the POST scores were not statistically equalized, these scores were all sufficient to pass. Further evaluation of this process will include assessment of knowledge retention among employees.

Guideline for prevention of nosocomial pneumonia. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Pneumonia is the second most common nosocomial infection in the United States and is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Most patients with nosocomial pneumonia are those with extremes of age, severe underlying disease, immunosuppression, depressed sensorium, and cardiopulmonary disease, and those who have had thoracoabdominal surgery. Although patients with mechanically assisted ventilation do not comprise a major proportion of patients with nosocomial pneumonia, they have the highest risk of developing the infection. Most bacterial nosocomial pneumonias occur by aspiration of bacteria colonizing the oropharynx or upper gastrointestinal tract of the patient. Intubation and mechanical ventilation greatly increase the risk of nosocomial bacterial pneumonia because they alter first-line patient defenses. Pneumonias due to Legionella spp., Aspergillus spp., and influenza virus are often caused by inhalation of contaminated aerosols. Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection usually follows viral inoculation of the conjunctivae or nasal mucosa by contaminated hands. Traditional preventive measures for nosocomial pneumonia include decreasing aspiration by the patient, preventing cross-contamination or colonization via hands of personnel, appropriate disinfection or sterilization or respiratory therapy devices, use of available vaccines to protect against particular infections, and education of hospital staff and patients. New measures under investigation involve reducing oropharyngeal and gastric colonization by pathogenic microorganisms.

An audit of the assessment and management of patients admitted to Christchurch Hospital with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

AIM: To audit the assessment and management of patients admitted to hospital with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) during three months of the winter of 1992. METHODS: Consensus management guidelines were developed as the basis for the audit. Consecutive cases were audited by review of the case notes. Half were admitted initially under a respiratory physician and half under a general physician. Ninety-five cases were audited. RESULTS: The overall standard of medical assessment was adequate but a number of deficiencies were identified. The mean duration of stay in hospital was nine days. In the emergency department the use of pulse oximetry in preference to arterial blood gas analysis led to failure to diagnose significant ventilatory failure in five cases. Initial assessment by junior medical staff failed to include comment about level of consciousness in 50% of cases and chest hyperinflation in 40%. Oxygen therapy was given in 87% of cases, but was not prescribed in one third and was often not adequately monitored. Peak flow monitoring was performed on admission in 74% of cases and arterial blood gas measurement in 81%. Over 90% of patients were given nebulised bronchodilator therapy with both nebulised ipratropium bromide and salbutamol. Antibiotics were given in 77% of cases. Corticosteroids were given in 95% of cases, usually orally. Sedatives were prescribed inappropriately in six cases where there was acute ventilatory failure. Four patients died in hospital, none unexpectedly. Three patients were mechanically ventilated and all survived to leave hospital. There was no discharge summary in the case records in 29% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: Standards of assessment and treatment were adequate. Several areas were identified where improvements are required, particularly in the prescribing and monitoring of oxygen therapy. Hospital-wide guidelines for the management of COPD are to be developed.

Benefits associated with a respiratory care assessment-treatment program: results of a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: During the months of July, August, and September 1993, we implemented a respiratory care assessment-treatment pilot study on the orthopedic surgery floor in our hospital. The purpose of the study was to determine feasibility and establish cost-effective treatment plans with quality patient outcomes, while maintaining appropriate communications with physicians and nursing staff. STUDY DEVELOPMENT & IMPLEMENTATION: The study's Task Force developed protocols for oxygen therapy, aerosolized medication therapy, volume expansion therapy, and bronchial hygiene therapy using the American Association for Respiratory Care's Clinical Practice Guidelines as supporting documents. Meetings were held with the orthopedic surgeons and nursing staff to inform them of the key components of the pilot program. Ten patient evaluators were trained to assess patients and implement treatment plans. EVALUATION METHODS: A reference book was established that contained the protocols and support material. Patient outcomes were evaluated using previously established quality assurance plans. The length of stay, procedural volume, and cost data were collected. EVALUATION RESULTS: More than 50% of the orders received during the pilot program were for "Respiratory Care Protocol." This allowed the patient care evaluator the flexibility to initiate one of the approved protocols if indicated. No changes in patient outcomes were noted and average length of stay remained unchanged during the pilot study compared to the base period. Treatment volumes decreased, resulting in identified cost savings of $5,318 during the study. Nurses and physicians supported protocol implementation, and increased communication among caregivers was documented. We believe that professionalism of the RCPs was enhanced without compromising the ultimate decision-making responsibilities of the physician. CONCLUSIONS: The use of respiratory care protocols is an acceptable method of developing clinically effective and fiscally responsible care plans. RCPs at our hospital were able to implement care plans that resulted in cost savings without a measured change in patient outcomes. Approval has been extended from the Executive Committee of the medical staff to expand hospital-wide.